The fifth symposium brought together senior officials from the Inland Revenue Department (IRD), the Ministry of Finance, economists, tax practitioners, and private sector leaders to discuss one of the most important policy questions facing Sri Lanka: How should the country's tax system evolve beyond economic stabilization toward sustainable growth?
The panel discussion focused on the fiscal priorities for Budget 2027, examining tax policy, revenue mobilization, investment competitiveness, fiscal resilience, debt sustainability, and the future direction of Sri Lanka's tax administration.
Raj Prabu Rajakulendran challenged the traditional emphasis on GDP growth, arguing that economic growth should be viewed as a means rather than the ultimate objective of economic policy.
He explained that countries can experience GDP growth while simultaneously facing:
Therefore, Sri Lanka should evaluate its success using broader indicators including:
According to him, fiscal policy should ultimately improve people's lives rather than simply produce higher GDP figures.
Raj Prabu identified three essential pillars of fiscal resilience.
Economic policies should prioritise:
instead of focusing solely on headline GDP numbers.
Maintaining healthy government finances requires:
rather than relying solely on higher taxation.
He noted that Sri Lanka's future challenges extend beyond tax collection.
Critical questions include:
He emphasised the importance of adopting a professional medium-term debt management strategy that anticipates future shocks.
Addressing the impact of taxation on investment, Raj Prabu made an important distinction.
He observed that international investor surveys consistently show that:
Investors are generally more concerned about unpredictable tax policy than about relatively high tax rates.
Frequent policy reversals create uncertainty and discourage investment.
His recommendation was therefore:
rather than focusing solely on reducing tax rates.
Raj Prabu also discussed State-Owned Enterprises including:
He argued that:
Passing inefficient purchasing decisions directly onto consumers, he noted, undermines public confidence.
Representing the Ministry of Finance, Thanuja Perera explained that Sri Lanka has largely completed the first phase of post-crisis fiscal stabilisation.
The next challenge is economic transformation.
She stated that modern tax policy should aim to:
rather than merely financing government expenditure.
The Ministry intends to maintain:
However, Thanuja emphasised that these objectives will primarily be achieved through:
rather than increasing existing tax rates.
According to the Ministry, one of Sri Lanka's biggest challenges remains low tax compliance.
Large numbers of liable taxpayers remain outside the formal tax system.
Future reforms therefore focus on:
The objective is to collect taxes from all liable taxpayers while reducing the burden on compliant taxpayers.
Thanuja also addressed questions regarding the postponement of the proposed VAT registration threshold reduction.
She explained that:
She further noted that the IMF programme focuses primarily on achieving agreed revenue targets rather than prescribing specific tax measures, giving the Government flexibility in selecting the most appropriate policy instruments.
Nandika Buddhipala acknowledged the importance of fiscal consolidation but cautioned against excessive dependence on indirect taxation.
His observations included:
He also highlighted Sri Lanka's long-standing challenges in attracting foreign direct investment and improving the ease of doing business.
Sulaiman focused on major international tax developments, particularly the OECD's BEPS Pillar Two initiative.
He explained that multinational enterprises are increasingly subject to a global minimum effective tax rate of 15%.
This presents Sri Lanka with both opportunities and challenges.
If Sri Lanka grants tax holidays below the global minimum rate:
therefore,
He suggested that Sri Lanka should carefully evaluate whether existing investment incentives remain effective under the new global tax landscape.
Sulaiman also highlighted several areas where Sri Lanka could expand future revenue generation.
These include:
He noted that conservation itself can become an economically valuable asset.
Drawing upon both operational experience and statistical analysis, Saman Dissanayake explained that tax administration involves far more than revenue collection.
He described taxation as an interconnected ecosystem involving:
According to him, every stakeholder influences the effectiveness of the tax system.
Although legislation now permits greater information exchange, practical implementation still faces obstacles.
He observed that several public institutions remain slow in sharing taxpayer information with the Inland Revenue Department.
Improving this cooperation, together with stronger digital integration, remains essential for future compliance improvements.
Using historical data, Saman illustrated the country's recovery in tax performance.
Key observations included:
According to the 2025 performance figures presented:
He also highlighted that in 2025:
Responding to audience questions regarding collectible tax arrears, Saman explained that legislative amendments have already been proposed to improve the treatment of long-outstanding tax balances.
He noted that further refinements to debt recovery mechanisms are expected as the administration continues modernising tax enforcement.
The discussion demonstrated broad consensus that Sri Lanka's tax system is entering a new phase.
While fiscal stabilisation remains important, future reforms must increasingly focus on:
As Sri Lanka prepares for Budget 2027, the panel emphasised that the country's next stage of reform should move beyond crisis management toward building a tax system that is predictable, technology-driven, equitable and supportive of sustainable long-term economic growth.